Complaints Regarding NBC's Broadcast of the 2004 Summer Olympics
Pleadings & Other Documents relating to Complaints Against Various Licensees Regarding Their Broadcast Of The Fox Television Network Program “Married By America” On April 7, 2003, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, FCC 04-242 (rel. October 12, 2004):
- Copies of Complaints
- Opposition to Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture submitted by Fox Broadcasting Company et al. on December 3, 2004
- Letter from Mission Broadcasting, Inc. to William H. Davenport, Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, dated December 7, 2004
- Opposition to Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture submitted by United Communications Corporation on December 3, 2004
- Opposition to Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture submitted by Lingard Broadcasting Company on December 3, 2004
- Letter from Bluenose Broadcasting of Savannah, LLC to William H. Davenport, Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, dated December 3, 2004
- Joint Response in Opposition to the Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture submitted by Falls Broadcasting Company and Compass Communications of Idaho, Inc. on December 3, 2004
- Cunningham Opposition to Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture submitted by Cunningham Broadcasting Corporation on December 3, 2004
- Opposition to Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture submitted by Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. on December 3, 2004
- Opposition to Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture submitted by White Knight Broadcasting of Natchez License Corp. et al. on December 3, 2004
- Letter from Hill Broadcasting Company, Inc. to the attention of William H. Davenport, Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, dated December 3, 2004
- Letter from Pappas Telecasting of Sioux City, L.P. et al. to the attention of William H. Davenport, Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, dated December 3, 2004
- Letter from Ft. Smith 46, Inc., et al. to William H. Davenport, Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, dated December 3, 2004
- Letter from Smith Media License Holdings, LLC to William H. Davenport, Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, dated December 3, 2004
- Opposition to Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture submitted by Independent Communications, Inc. on November 12, 2004
- Letter from JW Broadcasting LLC to Marlene H. Dorch, Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, dated November 5, 2004
- Letter from Sunbeam Television Corporation to Forfeiture Collections Agency, Federal Communications Commission dated November 29, 2004
Pleadings relating to Complaints Against Various Television Licensees Concerning Their February 1, 2004, Broadcast of the Super Bowl XXXVIII Halftime Show, Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture, FCC 04-209 (rel. September 22, 2004):
- Opposition to Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture submitted by CBS Broadcasting, Inc. on November 5, 2004
Pleadings relating to Complaints Against Various Broadcast Licensees Regarding Their Airing of the “Golden Globe Awards” Program, Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 04-43 (rel. March 18, 2004):
- Comments of Morality in Media
- Comments of Center for Creative Voices in Media
- Opposition to NBC's Petition for Partial Reconsideration Filed by Parents Television Council
- Joint Petition for a Stay
- Petition for Partial Reconsideration Filed by the National Broadcasting Company, Inc.
- Petition for Reconsideration Filed by ACLU et al.
- Petition for Reconsideration Filed by David Tillotson
- Comments of NBC Television Affiliates
- Comments of Public Broadcasters on the Petitions
- Comments of the Radio-Television News Directors Association on the petitions
- Comments of the CBS Television Network Affiliates Association
- Comments of the Media Institute and Members of its First Amendment Advisory Council